Forgot Password

Sign In


  • Company Information

  • Billing Address

  • Are you primarily interested in advertising *

  • Do you want to recieve the HealthTimes Newsletter?

  • Study shows genes won't affect weight loss

    Author: AAP

A new US study shows there is probably no such thing as a diet that is right for a person's particular genetic make-up.

The amount and quality of food and not a person's genetics will lead to weight loss, a US study has found.

Subscribe for FREE to the HealthTimes magazine

It has been suggested that variations in genetic makeup make it easier for some people to lose weight than others on certain diets.

To test this theory researchers at Stanford University conducted a randomised control trial involving 609 overweight adults, who all underwent genetic and insulin testing, before being randomly assigned to either a low-fat or low-carb diet for 12 months.

Gene analyses identified variations linked with how the body processes fats or carbohydrates. But weight loss averaged around five to six kilos at follow up regardless of genes, insulin levels or diet type.


Paediatrics Consultant
Omega Medical Pty Ltd
Omega Medical Pty Ltd
Paediatrics SRMO/Reg
Omega Medical Pty Ltd
General Medicine Registrar/HMO
Omega Medical Pty Ltd

What seemed to make a difference was healthy eating, researchers said.

Participants who ate the most vegetables and consumed the fewest processed foods, sugary drinks, unhealthy fats lost the most weight.

Australian expert, Professor Lennert Veerman from the School of Medicine at Griffith University, said the study showed there is probably no such thing as a diet right for a particular genetic make-up.

"We eat to fill our stomach, and if that's with vegetables we tend to lose weight, whereas if it's with chocolate or French fries, flushed down with a soda, we gain weight," said Professor Veerman.

The study was published Tuesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Participants had 22 health education classes during the study and were encouraged to be physically active, but the focus was on what they ate.

They were advised to choose high-quality foods but were not given suggested calorie limits nor were they provided with specific foods. Results are based on what they reported eating.

Fat intake in the low-fat group averaged 57 grams during the study versus 87 grams beforehand, while carb intake in the low-carb group averaged 132 grams versus 247 grams previously.

Both groups reduced their daily calorie intake by an average of about 500 calories.

Leading Australian nutritionist Dr Rosemary Stanton, a Visiting Fellow from the School of Medical Sciences at The University of New South Wales (UNSW), says the "excellent" study highlights the importance of eating plenty of vegetables.

Dr Stanton advises people to seek professional help to choose quality foods because the macronutrient content of of a diet "does not really matter".

"Some previous studies that have damned carbohydrates have not taken note of the foods that supplied it. For example, lentils and lollies are both 'carbs' but one is a nutrient-dense high quality food while the other is junk. Simply calling them 'carbs' does not provide this vital distinction," said Dr Stanton.

While most diets work, the real challenge is sticking with them, says Dr Veerman said.

"Instead of 'going on a diet', it would be better to find new, healthier habits," he said.


Thanks, you've subscribed!

Share this free subscription offer with your friends

Email to a Friend

  • Remaining Characters: 500